My response to ‘An Argument Against Connectivism’

“The only way this is relevant to teaching practice is if students have access to technology in the classroom.”

I agree that connectivism is most relevant with classrooms that have technology. However, the basic idea of connectivism has been around before technology and its theory could be applied without the use of current advancements in technology. In George Siemens’ definition of connectivism, “the integration of principles explored by chaos, network, and complexity and self-organization theories,” he does not mention the need of technology in his theory.

These types of skills that define connectivism, can be applied in other ways with classrooms that lack the technology. For instance, students can network within their school and community by participating in face-to-face interactions or by using other forms of communication. In today’s world, technology has made it much more efficient and easier to apply the principals of connectivity, making it seem impossible without it.

http://spring17-bce-01.wikispaces.com/Group+B+6-A-1

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s